BUS 202 Quantitative Applications
Solutions to Assignment 11
5-18.
MIN 5 X11 + 7 X12 + 6 X13 + 8 X21 + 9 X22 + 10 X23 + 4 X31 + 3 X32 + 11X33
SUBJECT TO
X11 + X12 + X13 <= 50
X21 + X22 + X23 <= 275
X31 + X32 + X33 <= 175
X11 + X21 + X31 >= 100
X12 + X22 + X32 >= 250
X13 + X23 + X33 >= 150
Solution
[go to top] [Any
questions?]
5-19.
The relevant cost that must be minimized is the transportation and
packaging costs. Thus the cell costs are the cost of packaging one unit
at a location and shipping it to a warehouse.
Since we have more capacity than demand, minimizing just the
transportation cost, may force the use of costlier capacity more fully
and leave some inexpensive capacity unused, leading to
sub-optimization. If we had just enough capacity to meet all demand,
simply minimizing the transportation costs would have been appropriate
since we would need all the capacity-- expensive and cheap.
Solution
[go to top] [Any
questions?]
5-25.
This is a straightforward assignment problem with a square cost matrix;
Solution
[go to top] [Any
questions?]
5-31.
Since there are more developers than plots one of the developers will
not get an assignment. We can handle the situation in two ways: 1)
Create a dummy plot (whoever gets the dummy plot does not get a real
plot) or 2) Enter the constraints for each developer as "<=" to
allow not assigning a plot to one of the developers as follows.
MAX 19 A1 + 19 A2 + 29 A3 + 23 A4 + 24 A5 + 23 B1 + 21 B2 + 27 B3
+ 19 B4 + 25 B5 + 19 C1 + 19 C2 + 22 C3 + 20 C5 + 23 D1 + 19 D3 + 21 D4
+ 18 D5
SUBJECT TO
A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 + A5 = 1
B1 + B2 + B3 + B4 + B5 = 1
C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 + C5 = 1
D1 + D2 + D3 + D4 + D5 = 1
A1 + B1 + C1 + D1 <= 1
A2 + B2 + C2 + D2 <= 1
A3 + B3 + C3 + D3 <= 1
A4 + B4 + C4 + D4 <= 1
A5 + B5 + C5 + D5 <= 1
Solution with a dummy plot
[go to top] [Any
questions?]
6-2.
- a) x1=3.5; x2=4.5; OV= 12.5
- b) There are 29 of them. Blue dots in the green area.
- c) There are two optimal solutions x1=0; x2=6 and x1=2; x2=5,
both have OV=12
- d) We get x1=3; x2=4; OV=11. clearly not optimal.
[go to top] [Any
questions?]
6-3.
For a Min problem the LP relaxation would provide a Lower Bound .
Since the LP relaxation is obtained by ignoring some
constraints(integrality) the solution value would be better (lower)
than if we had enforced those constraints.
6-4.
For a Min problem a feasible solution (obtained by rounding the LP
solution or any other means) gives an Upper Bound . Since we
are not interested in any solution whose value exceeds the value of
this known solution.
6-5.
For a Max problem the LP provides an Upper Bound .
6-6.
For a Max problem rounding (to get a feasible solution would give a Lower
Bound .
[go to top] [Any
questions?]
6-18.
Let Aj, Bj and Cj the shipments from warehouse A, B and C to customer j
and YA, YB, and YC zero/one switch variables denoting whether warehouse
A, B, and C will be used. Since warehouses can be assumed to have
unlimited capacity, for modeling purposes we might consider the
capcities (if operated) to be equal to the total demand, the most that
might ever be shipped from a single warehouse.
MIN 15A1 + 32A2 + 21A3 + 9B1 + 7B2 + 6B3 + 11C1 + 18C2
+ 5C3 + 500YA + 750YB + 600YC
SUBJECT TO
A1 + B1 + C1 >= 200
A2 + B2 + C2 >= 150
A3 + B3 + C3 >= 175
A1 + A2 + A3 <= 525YA
B1 + B2 + B3 <= 525YB
C1 + C2 + C3 <= 525YC
YA + YB + YC >= 2
Aj, Bj, Cj>=0, YA, YB, YC =0,1
Excel solution
[go to top] [Any
questions?]