[OPE-L:5035] Re: The RRPE Controversy

From: Gerald_A_Levy (Gerald_A_Levy@email.msn.com)
Date: Thu Feb 22 2001 - 12:23:45 EST

Next message: Drewk: "[OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy"
Previous message: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:5034] Re: Re: RE: numerical example!!!"
In reply to: Gerald_A_Levy: "[OPE-L:5014] The RRPE Controversy"
Next in thread: Drewk: "[OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy"
Reply: Drewk: "[OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I look forward to the IWGVT  mini-conference that begins tomorrow.  At that
time Andrew K and anyone else who makes the charge that their work has been
"suppressed" by the _RRPE_ or any other group will be expected to either
furnish *proof*  or offer apologies to all concerned.

Anything else, the way I understand the official standards of the IWGVT,
would be a violation of IWGVT policy.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Drewk: "[OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy"
Previous message: Allin Cottrell: "[OPE-L:5034] Re: Re: RE: numerical example!!!"
In reply to: Gerald_A_Levy: "[OPE-L:5014] The RRPE Controversy"
Next in thread: Drewk: "[OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy"
Reply: Drewk: "[OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:40 EST