Re: The increasing transformation problem

From: Paul Cockshott (wpc@DCS.GLA.AC.UK)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 10:13:41 EDT


Paul Bullock wrote:
Because the empirical evidence diverges somewhat from the
predictions of volume 3, the form of the divergence is explicable
by Farjoun and Machovers statistical mechanics theory.
They predicted the divergence prior to the empirical work
being done.

> Why not 'Capital' by K Marx?
>
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From:Paul Cockshott
>      To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
>      Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:04 AM
>      Subject: Re: The increasing transformation problem
>       Ernesto Screpanti wrote:
>      This is very interesting. Can you give me the references, please?
>
>     >
>     > However I am interested in the theoretical relationship between production prices and values.
>     >
>     > In solidarity
>     >
>     > Ernesto
>
>      I think the theory supporting the empirical results is best
>      provided by Farjoun and Machover in their book 'The laws of Chaos'
>
>      --
>      Paul Cockshott
>      Dept Computing Science
>      University of Glasgow
>
>
>
>      0141 330 3125
>
>
>
--
Paul Cockshott
Dept Computing Science
University of Glasgow

0141 330 3125


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 00:00:01 EDT