Re: [OPE-L] Is this an example of the "new pluralism" in economics?

From: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM
Date: Fri Mar 11 2005 - 09:57:43 EST

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] GM junk bonds"
Previous message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Is this an example of the "new pluralism" in economics?"
Maybe in reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Is this an example of the "new pluralism" in economics?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Footnote to previous post:

I find it highly suspect that the economics profession, which since the
1870's and the rise of marginalism has waged a relentless war against
pluralism within the profession, should only in recent years

===>  AFTER the French students declaration in support of pluralism and
             against  'autistic economics'

> http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3780/is_200104/ai_n8936788
<===

should THEN say that they are committed to pluralism.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] GM junk bonds"
Previous message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Is this an example of the "new pluralism" in economics?"
Maybe in reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L] Is this an example of the "new pluralism" in economics?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 12 2005 - 00:00:01 EST