Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Thu Apr 07 2005 - 15:10:31 EDT

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
In reply to: Nicola Taylor: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 2:06 AM +1000 4/8/05, Nicola Taylor wrote:
>Andy,
>
>actually, an argument has been presented many times.  Have you
>seriously read Reuten, Williams and Chris Arthur on the distinction
>between labour and labour power?
>
>How is your conception of labour (and labour power) different from theirs?
>

Nicky what is your argument?

Rakesh

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Previous message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
In reply to: Nicola Taylor: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Next in thread: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT