[OPE-L] On inevitability

From: michael a. lebowitz (mlebowit@SFU.CA)
Date: Sat Sep 24 2005 - 21:46:02 EDT

• Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] On inevitability"
• Previous message: Philip Dunn: "[OPE-L] The Accountant in End Times: was [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] On inevitability"
• Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] On inevitability"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 16:14 23/09/2005, Rakesh wrote:

>But this list seems intent on pursuing the discussion of Sraffa and
>economics rather than Marx. That was inevitable once an economist
>demanded that he remain in charge forever.
>
>Rakesh

         Without in any way granting the premise that any economist
made such a demand (something you have raised ad nauseam on this list
but without getting any support that I am aware of), how does having
an economist as (non-monitoring) moderator make it 'inevitable' that
this list pursues 'the discussion of Sraffa and economics rather than
Marx'? I think I'm missing something.
         michael

---------------------
Michael A. Lebowitz
Professor Emeritus
Economics Department
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, B.C., Canada V5A 1S6
Office Fax:   (604) 291-5944
Home:   Phone (604) 689-9510

• Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] On inevitability"
• Previous message: Philip Dunn: "[OPE-L] The Accountant in End Times: was [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] On inevitability"
• Reply: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] On inevitability"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 25 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT