[OPE-L] dialectical contradiction in Marx's works?

From: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM
Date: Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:42:04 EDT

• Next message: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• Previous message: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

A nine-page listing by Tom Weston: "Some Materials on Dialectical 
Contradiction in Marx's Works":
http://tomweston.net/DialectContr.htm

================================================

1.  Weston doesn't define "dialectical contradiction" in the above.
     
2.  Are all of the "dialectical contradictions" (dc) that Weston lists 
     actually instances of dc?   Is he using or mis-using this expression?

3.  In the note preceding the listing, he wrote:  the "Aveling-Moore
     translation of *Capital*, vol. 1, which is followed in the *Collected
     Works*, vol. 35, is not adequate for philosophical study despite its 
     charm."    Do you agree with this?

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• Previous message: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 27 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT