Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination

From: Ian Wright (wrighti@ACM.ORG)
Date: Wed Sep 12 2007 - 01:14:56 EDT

• Next message: ajit sinha: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
• Previous message: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] Truncating Marx"
• In reply to: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
• Next in thread: ajit sinha: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I am disappointed that you think I am "fulminating".

Sorry Fred, this adjective wasn't meant for you; I had some of the
TSSI articles in mind. You do not fulminate.

Will reply properly as time permits.

• Next message: ajit sinha: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
• Previous message: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] Truncating Marx"
• In reply to: Fred Moseley: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
• Next in thread: ajit sinha: "Re: [OPE-L] equilibrium and simultaneous vs. sequential determination"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 30 2007 - 00:00:05 EDT