From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2008 - 11:35:28 EST
Paul C., OK.
Note, however, that I have extensively looked at Marx's use of
'accumulation' -- see the following web link:
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka/accumula.htm
Unfortunately, the links contained therein to Marx's work are broken
because csf.colorado.edu/... is no longer home to Marx's works. Still,
enough of Marx's text is there to often know what is going on; in any case,
the text can be "searched".
The main link reports on
-- "accumulation", and therefore "accumulations" (14) and
"accumulation's" (1), as well as for "accumulating" (14) and "accumulates"
(10). 382 matches for "accumulation" in 70 files were found.
I don't know more what I could have done at the time, other than the next
step I performed of analyzing Marx's usages. Since then, I have work more
on the Volume II than I did at the time.
Paul Z.
--On 1/10/2008 4:01 PM +0000 Paul Cockshott wrote:
> I am not wanting to dismiss your research Paul Z,
> I think the issues are important, and in the end the meaning of the words
> used by an author depends on how that author deploys them.
>
> Provided that they do so consistently others can understand what they
> mean. I would not have used the same terminology as you, because I find
> that separating the concepts of accumulation from extended reproduction
> of capitalist social relations is helpful in thinking through the
> processes leading to a declining rate of profit. If that is not ones
> focus, you may well find a different terminology to be more useful.
************************************************************************
(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001 -- U.S. softcover forthcoming
video summary at http://snowshoefilms.com
(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA
********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST