Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital

From: Dave Zachariah (davez@KTH.SE)
Date: Sat Jan 12 2008 - 05:26:59 EST

Next message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Previous message: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

on 2008-01-12 03:36 Jerry Levy wrote:
> Insofar as the numerator is concerned, surplus _value_ rather than
> the more general and trans-historical category of surplus-labour is specified: surplus labour is performed in all class societies.
>


Ok, so what is the unit you would measure the annual flow of *surplus
value* in?

//Dave Z

Next message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Previous message: Ian Hunt: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
In reply to: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Next in thread: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST