From: paul bullock (paulbullock@ebms-ltd.co.uk)
Date: Sat Apr 12 2008 - 17:00:38 EDT
Gerry,
the btopic of money in non capitalist states is really important to reconsider if we are thinking of post capitalist or transition processes, tghis is why I am concerned here with the further past.
paul
----- Original Message -----
From: GERALD LEVY
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:16 AM
Subject: RE: [OPE] Dialectics for the New Century -money and the state
> Paul C and I are discussing pre capitalist relations and the development of money.
Paul B:
So both of you agree that this topic has no bearing whatsoever on
the topic of monetary relations and the state under conditions
of capitalist social relations? The question of a "state theory of money"
(something that was most certainly part of this thread) is not just a
historical question but also concerns the present and the manner in
which the value-form and the state (and all relevant topics) are theorized.
It was to that topic that my comments were directed.
In solidarity, Jerry
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 30 2008 - 00:00:18 EDT