RE: [OPE] Productive and unproductive labour in the financial sector

From: Paul Cockshott <wpc@dcs.gla.ac.uk>
Date: Thu Jul 16 2009 - 06:28:59 EDT

But these are undefined numbers.
Some depositors - those with current accounts for example get no interest,
The rate paid by borrows is also a spectrum of values.

-----Original Message-----
From: ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu [mailto:ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu] On Behalf Of Philip Dunn
Sent: 16 July 2009 00:16
To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
Subject: Re: [OPE] Productive and unproductive labour in the financial sector

On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 22:54 +0100, Paul wrote:

>
> Did you write that wiki page Philip?
No.
> The argument there seems remarkably unpersuasive. It admits that banking
> labour is not fully paid for out of charges for transactional services (
> clearing cheques etc ) and that it is supported out of interest.

Not quite. The difference between the interest the bank pays to
depositors and the interest it receives from borrowers is sales revenue.
A reference rate of interest, at which no FISIM revenue arises, is the
rate at which income is transferred from borrowers to depositors. The
difference between interest at the reference rate and interest at the
rate a depositor receives is expenditure for the depositor. Similarly,
the difference between interest at the rate a borrower pays and interest
at the reference rate is expenditure for the borrower.

The "true" interest rate is the reference rate.

_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope

The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Jul 16 06:34:19 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 31 2009 - 00:00:02 EDT