RE: [OPE] No rise is s/v? Kliman's empirical work on the falling rate of profit

         <1255830253.18922.111.camel@pdunn2-40gb>
 
 <4ADB1BD5.1010109@buffalo.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

> I quite doubt Jerry is resting his case.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=20
Paul is correct: I'm not resting my case=2C Phil.
It is such a basic issue=2C though=2C that nothing else in the
paper is worthy of discussion unless and until there is a=20
satisfactory (and that includes non-evasive=2C internally=20
consistent=2C and logical reply) to that issue.=20
=20
In solidarity=2C Jerry
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=20

=20
=20
>>>> What's wrong with easy=2C Paul? It is preferable to difficult or downr=
ight
>>>> impossible.
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Hi Phil (and Paul Z):
>>>
>>> Easy is one thing=2C but Paul Z said _too_ easy.
>>>
>>> In solidarity=2C Jerry
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Hi Gerry=2C
>>
>> You rest your case?
> =
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sun Oct 18 10:05:24 2009