On 20 October 2010 14:20, GERALD LEVY <gerald_a_levy@msn.com> wrote:
>
> If we treat 'luxuries' as simply part of Dept. II (means of consumption)
> then why would any of the rest follow?
>
>
This misses the point completely.
The point was that once you partition the economic system in this way you
realize that certain properties relevant to the questions of
productive/unproductive labour were not apparent in Marx's lower resolution
model. Once you increase resolution you can see them.
//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Oct 20 08:47:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 31 2010 - 00:00:02 EDT