Paul Z wrote in [OPE-L:1903]:
> I feel I am getting repetitive and don't understand where the problem
> lies with my intervention on this issue.
I agree that we're getting repetitive. However, let me re-phrase my
question: either suppose a case or cite one where a writer does not use
the definition you suggest *and* that then leads that person into future
analytical problems as the exposition of her/his theory develops?
Or, to make the question easier, how might my use of the term lead to
analytical difficulties?
In OPE-L Solidarity,
Jerry