There is much in Ted's [OPE-L:3008] that deserves commentary and I trust
that others will have something to say about his comments on Hegel,
empiricism, value-form analysis, critical dialogue, etc..
Ted asked me a direct question:
> In this regard, what do you think about
> Andrew's "scorecard" (in the response to Laibman paper) comparing the results
> of the TSS interpretation with the standard and simultaneist interpretations
> of some of Marx's key results?
My answer:
Huh?
I must have missed Andrew's "scorecard" (or, at least, I don't
remember it). When did the SSSers agree to let Andrew keep score? Did
David L challenge Andrew's score?
I must say that the very idea of a "scorecard" on this issue sounds a bit
odd to me because of its obvious analogy to sports and games.
> I went on longer than I planned....security
> at the college tells me I have to leave the building!!
I hope you made it out OK and that the score is Ted=1, Security Guard=0.
In OPE-L Solidarity,
Jerry