Andrew K wrote in [OPE-L:5284]:
> In reality, no two things are identical, so no input is physically identical
> to any output. Once you get rid of the assumption that inputs are physically
> identical to outputs, Jerry, you immediately and necessarily get rid of
> simultaneous valuation of inputs and outputs, so that doesn't help your side
> at all, to say the least.
The inference above is that "my side" is the side of simultaneous
valuation. That is mistaken.
> The distinction between "petty commodity producers" and
> "wage-laborers" is, in any case, almost wholly a mere formal distinction
> today.
Please explain.
In solidarity, Jerry