> (6) One cannot accept this argument -- or use the falling valu
e
> argument to defend Marx's law of the tendential fall in the
> profit rate -- and, at the same time, advocate Moseley's
> interpretation of Marx's value theory (as Rakesh has done),
> because Moseley is a simultaneist. In other words, it follows
> from his interpretation that riding productivity and falling
> values will RAISE, not lower, the profit rate.
Fred: when did you convert to simultaneism?
Andrew: in what sense can it be said that Fred is a "simultaneist"?
Also: why does *Fred's interpretation* -- re "givens" in Marx's theory --
require that "riding (sic) productivity and falling values will RAISE, not
lower, the profit rate"?
In solidarity, Jerry