[OPE-L:1735] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories

Subject: [OPE-L:1735] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories
From: Antonio Callari (a_Callari@ACAD.FANDM.EDU)
Date: Thu Nov 25 1999 - 10:36:38 EST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Gerald Levy: "[OPE-L:1736] Re: value-form theories"
• Previous message: Gerald Levy: "[OPE-L:1734] Re: another journal?"
• In reply to: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:1731] Re: Re: value-form theories"
• Next in thread: Gerald Levy: "[OPE-L:1736] Re: value-form theories"
• Reply: Antonio Callari: "[OPE-L:1735] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories"

Fred (or anyone): what do you mean by the statement below?

>it seems to me that R&W's main criticism
>of Marx's concept of abstract labor as the substance of value is the old
>"reduction problem", which I don't think is much of a problem.

To what are you referring as the "old reduction problem"?

thanks!

Antonio

Antonio Callari
E-MAIL: A_CALLARI@ACAD.FANDM.EDU
POST MAIL: Department of Economics
                Franklin and Marshall College
                Lancaster PA 17604-3003
PHONE: 717/291-3947
FAX: 717/291-4369

• Next message: Gerald Levy: "[OPE-L:1736] Re: value-form theories"
• Previous message: Gerald Levy: "[OPE-L:1734] Re: another journal?"
• In reply to: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:1731] Re: Re: value-form theories"
• Next in thread: Gerald Levy: "[OPE-L:1736] Re: value-form theories"
• Reply: Antonio Callari: "[OPE-L:1735] Re: Re: Re: value-form theories"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Sun Dec 12 1999 - 17:29:16 EST