[ show plain text ]
Paul C wrote:
> There is some possibility within agriculture of having units of production
> which continue to produce commodities but do not engender captialist
> relations - collective farms. They differ from other commodity producing
> units in the following fashion:
> 1. their major productive input - land - is not a commodity, and cannot
> be purchased of sold.
> 2. there is a large measure of internal self sufficiency - many of the
> inputs
> used are grown locally - fodder etc.
> 3. the participation in labout is hereditary rather than flexible, which
> inhibits
> the formation of wage relations.
>
Hereditary?!
Julian
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 31 2000 - 07:00:07 EST