[OPE-L:3403] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value

From: Michael Perelman (michael@ecst.csuchico.edu)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2000 - 11:00:30 EDT

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "[OPE-L:3404] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value"
Previous message: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3402] Re: Re: objectivity of value"
In reply to: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3402] Re: Re: objectivity of value"
Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "[OPE-L:3404] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

One source I enjoy in this respect is

Brooks Jr., Frederick P. 1975. The Mythical Man-Month: Essays in
Software Engineering (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley).

"Patrick L. Mason" wrote:

> I agree. Abstract labor is unobservable and probably unmeasurable, just as
> utility is unobservable and unmeasurable. Nevertheless, abstract labor and
> labor values do provide empirical implications.
>

-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "[OPE-L:3404] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value"
Previous message: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3402] Re: Re: objectivity of value"
In reply to: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3402] Re: Re: objectivity of value"
Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "[OPE-L:3404] Re: Re: Re: objectivity of value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 30 2000 - 00:00:03 EDT