[OPE-L:3737] Re: Re: Re: Re: surplus value and transferrred value

• Next message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3738] Relative values reflected in relative prices, an assumption of Volume I"
• Previous message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3736] Re: Re: Re: surplus value and transferrred value"
• In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3736] Re: Re: Re: surplus value and transferrred value"
• Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3738] Relative values reflected in relative prices, an assumption of Volume I"
• Reply: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3738] Relative values reflected in relative prices, an assumption of Volume I"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ show plain text ]

A question concerning Paul Zarembka's OPE-L 2736.

Hi Paul,

You wrote:

: When organic compositions of capital are the same across industries --
as
: Marx assumes in Vol. 1 -- relative values are reflected in relative
: prices. He is fully permitted to use either labor time or pounds.

Where in Vol. I does he make this assumption. I don't remember it.

Ciao,

Andrew

• Next message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3738] Relative values reflected in relative prices, an assumption of Volume I"
• Previous message: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3736] Re: Re: Re: surplus value and transferrred value"
• In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3736] Re: Re: Re: surplus value and transferrred value"
• Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3738] Relative values reflected in relative prices, an assumption of Volume I"
• Reply: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:3738] Relative values reflected in relative prices, an assumption of Volume I"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 31 2000 - 00:00:04 EDT