[OPE-L:3839] no subject

From: glevy@pratt.edu
Date: Mon Sep 18 2000 - 12:50:54 EDT


[ show plain text ]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: michael@ecst.csuchico.edu

I would say, d.

> Michael P wrote in [OPE-L:3836]:

> > The transformation problem [in the form of an
> > algebraic solution] does not make sense.

> Hi, Michael.

> What are you saying the problem is here? Is it:

> a) the idea that the transformation can be expressed algebraicly?
> b) the assumptions re fixed capital concerning the transformation?
> c) neither of the above?
> d) both of the above?

> Please explain.

> In solidarity, Jerry

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 30 2000 - 00:00:05 EDT