On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Rakesh Narpat Bhandari wrote: > Given your definition of surplus value as the value of the output > minus the value of the inputs, surplus value and cost price cannot > remain resolved, antagonistic components of total value but rather > become (at least partially) independently determined magnitudes. It's perfectly symmetrical. Given your definition of surplus value as the price of the output minus the price of the inputs, surplus value and value of inputs cannot remain resolved, constant-sum, components of total value. That seems worse to me (of course). Allin C.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 30 2000 - 00:00:05 EST