ope-l-0106
By Thread

Starting: Fri Jun 01 2001 - 00:11:23 EDT
Ending: Fri Jun 29 2001 - 04:59:54 EDT

• [OPE-L:5720] Re: Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 03:11:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5721] Re: Re: Re: Re: de-bunking the de-bunk Steve Keen (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 03:42:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5722] Re: Re: why are we on this list? Steve Keen (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 03:45:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5723] Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 04:36:36 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5724] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? Ajit Sinha (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 05:33:40 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5727] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 11:10:15 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5725] Re: why are we on this list? Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 08:28:59 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5728] Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 11:20:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5726] Re: why are we on this list? Allin Cottrell (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 10:35:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5729] Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 11:28:16 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5730] Re: Response to Fred - 1 charlie (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 11:38:40 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5731] RE: Re: why are we on this list? mongiovg (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 12:59:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5733] RE: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 14:33:33 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5745] Re: RE: Re: why are we on this list? Ajit Sinha (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 04:13:07 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5735] Re: RE: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 16:08:13 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5738] Re: why are we on this list? Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 21:30:25 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5739] Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 22:07:36 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5740] Re: Blauf on neoclassicism Steve Keen (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 02:08:44 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5741] Re: Re: Blauf on neoclassicism Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 02:23:01 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5743] Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 03:48:19 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5742] Re: Re: why are we on this list? Ajit Sinha (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 03:07:35 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5744] Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 04:04:58 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5732] Re: Re: Re: why are we on this list? glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 13:02:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5734] Re: why are we on this list? glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 15:32:33 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5736] RE: Re: Re: de-bunking the de-bunk Michael Williams (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 19:00:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5737] Reply to fred - A Christopher Arthur (Fri Jun 01 2001 - 20:28:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5747] Reply to Fred - B Christopher Arthur (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 12:32:22 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5783] Re: Reply to Fred - B Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 12:38:53 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5801] socialism and the small farmer Paul Cockshott (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 08:23:10 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5813] Re: socialism and the small farmer charlie (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 23:35:44 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5820] Re: socialism and the small farmer Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 09:28:16 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5824] Re: socialism and the small farmer Alejandro Valle Baeza (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 13:43:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5748] Reply to fred - B extra Christopher Arthur (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 13:40:21 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5784] Re: Reply to fred - B extra Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 12:43:42 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5862] Re: Re: Reply to fred - B extra Christopher Arthur (Fri Jun 15 2001 - 17:56:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5782] Re: Reply to fred - A Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 12:16:55 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5861] Re: Reply to fred - A & B Christopher Arthur (Fri Jun 15 2001 - 20:20:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5746] the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 09:17:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5749] Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Alejandro Valle Baeza (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 13:56:29 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5750] Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Andrew Brown (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 15:41:10 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5752] Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 21:20:21 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5754] Re: Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Steve Keen (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 21:48:31 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5772] Re: Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Andrew Brown (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 05:12:00 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5774] cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Marxist 'obsession' Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 07:28:43 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5789] Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Marxist 'obsession' Andrew Brown (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 06:01:44 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5753] Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Steve Keen (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 21:43:27 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5756] Re: Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 23:07:46 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5757] Re: Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 07:03:09 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5759] Re: Re: Re: the infinite quantity of logically plausible social theories theorem (IQLPSTT) Steve Keen (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 08:00:41 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5760] heterodox theories of value Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 10:24:10 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5767] Re: heterodox theories of value Steve Keen (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 19:36:47 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5768] Re: Re: heterodox theories of value Ajit Sinha (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 01:37:34 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5776] Re: Re: Re: heterodox theories of value Steve Keen (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 09:24:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5751] RE: Re: why are we on this list? mongiovg (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 18:53:58 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5755] Re: RE: Re: why are we on this list? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Jun 02 2001 - 22:30:38 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5761] A student of Grossman and Mattick? Paul Zarembka (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 11:52:42 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5764] Re: A student of Grossman and Mattick? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 14:55:56 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5758] RE: why are we on this list? => Ricardo & Marx: accuracy of Subject field. Michael Williams (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 06:31:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5762] RE: heterodox theories of value A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 12:27:23 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5763] RE: Re: Marx & Ricardo mongiovg (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 12:39:04 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5765] Re: Marx & Ricardo Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 16:47:16 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5766] Re: Marx & Ricardo Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Jun 03 2001 - 18:26:44 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5770] Re: Re: Marx & Ricardo Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 02:54:08 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5771] 'value' / Marx & Ricardo Andrew Brown (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 04:53:57 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5786] Re: Marx and Ricardo [and Malthus] Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 08:55:21 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5781] Re: Re: Marx & Ricardo Paul Zarembka (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 11:53:15 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5791] Re: Marx & Ricardo Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 09:08:49 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5810] Re: Re: Marx & Ricardo Paul Zarembka (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 08:30:33 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5811] Lenin and the agrarian question Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 17:40:34 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5769] RE: Re: Marx & Ricardo Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 02:53:46 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5773] RE: Re: Re: heterodox theories of value and Grossman n A.B.Trigg@open.ac.uk (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 05:58:54 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5775] Re: RE: Re: Re: heterodox theories of value and Grossman n Paul Cockshott (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 09:10:50 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5788] Marx's and Kalecki's monetary insights Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 04:46:45 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5792] Re: Marx's and Kalecki's monetary insights Steve Keen (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 08:51:56 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5799] Re: Marx's and Kalecki's monetary insights Paul Cockshott (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 06:34:18 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5779] Re: RE: Re: Re: heterodox theories of value and Grossman n Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 11:43:37 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5777] Re: RE: Re: Re: heterodox theories of value and Grossman n Steve Keen (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 09:30:13 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5778] Re: Grossmann & Mattick John Ernst (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 10:58:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5780] Re: Marx and Ricardo [and Malthus] Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 11:45:36 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5787] Re: Re: Marx and Ricardo [and Malthus] Michael Perelman (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 18:57:12 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5785] Re: Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 04 2001 - 13:49:17 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5790] Re: Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Andrew Brown (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 07:44:05 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5793] Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Andrew Brown (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 09:15:39 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5800] Re: Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 08:05:40 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5802] Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Andrew Brown (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 09:02:33 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5805] Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Marxist 'obsession' Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 10:05:45 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5807] Re: Re: cause(s) and consequence(s) of the Marxist 'obsession' Andrew Brown (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:49:52 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5794] Re: Marx's and Kalecki's monetary insights glevy@pratt.edu (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 12:04:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5796] form and content re value-form and abstract labour Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Jun 05 2001 - 16:19:52 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5797] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 04:43:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5808] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 12:42:51 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5812] RE: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Michael Williams (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 17:40:24 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5815] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 05:15:19 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5822] Re: RE: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 10:20:42 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5827] RE: RE: Re: form and content re value-form and abstractlabour Michael Williams (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 17:38:48 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5829] Re: form and content re value-form and abstractlabour Andrew Brown (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 06:17:04 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5830] RE: form and content re value-form and abstractlabour Michael Williams (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 07:09:08 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5816] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 07:29:48 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5798] RE: RE: Re: Re: heterodox theories of value and Gros sman n Makoto Itoh (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 06:00:32 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5803] Re: heterodox theories of value Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 09:14:27 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5804] Re: Re: heterodox theories of value Steve Keen (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 09:43:38 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5806] Re: Re: Re: Response to Fred - 1 Fred B. Moseley (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 11:26:56 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5814] Re: socialism and the small farmer paul bullock (Wed Jun 06 2001 - 17:39:21 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5819] Re: Re: socialism and the small farmer Paul (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 08:10:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5817] RE: Teach yourself the Value-form Michael Williams (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 07:50:08 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5821] proletarianization and the industrial reserve army Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 09:28:30 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5823] Re: Re: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 10:32:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5825] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 13:56:15 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5831] Re: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 07:25:56 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5832] congealment: a metaphor? Andrew Brown (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 07:26:05 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5835] RE: congealment: a metaphor? Michael Williams (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 08:57:50 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5836] quasi-separation Andrew Brown (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 09:26:47 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5837] RE: quasi-separation Michael Williams (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 09:57:48 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5838] Re: quasi-separation Andrew Brown (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 10:30:02 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5826] Re: Re: Re: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Mr. Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Jun 07 2001 - 16:14:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5828] RE: RE: RE: Re: form and content re value-form and abstractlabour Chai-on Lee (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 03:12:01 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5834] Re: form and content re value-form and abstractlabour Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 08:21:43 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5840] RE: Re: form and content re value-form and abstractlabour Chai-on Lee (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 20:39:50 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5839] Re: form and content re value-form and abst Andrew Brown (Fri Jun 08 2001 - 11:01:32 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5841] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 00:57:02 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5844] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 11:50:22 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5849] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Sun Jun 10 2001 - 12:57:01 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5853] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 08:21:30 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5854] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 06:24:44 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5855] Re: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 10:09:48 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5850] Re: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 00:57:53 EDT)
      • [OPE-L:5851] Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Andrew Brown (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 05:01:01 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5842] RE: RE: RE: Re: form and content re value-form andabstractlabour Fred B. Moseley (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 01:04:41 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5843] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: form and content re value-formandabstractlabour Michael Williams (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 10:14:44 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5845] Microeconomics Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 13:40:00 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5847] Re: Microeconomics Steve Keen (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 20:45:09 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5848] Re: Microeconomics Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Jun 10 2001 - 08:14:11 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5846] Re: HES: QUERY -- reswitching Steve Keen (Sat Jun 09 2001 - 16:49:39 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5852] FW: Re: heterodox theories of value Makoto Itoh (Mon Jun 11 2001 - 06:14:31 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5856] Re: Re: Re: form and content re value-form and abstract labour Mr. Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 14:02:06 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5857] Re: form and content re value-form and abst Andrew Brown (Tue Jun 12 2001 - 13:38:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5858] outward bound! Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Jun 13 2001 - 06:21:22 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5859] The distribution of surplus-value in Volume 3 of Capital Fred B. Moseley (Thu Jun 14 2001 - 10:24:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5863] Re: Re: Reply to fred - A & B Paul (Sun Jun 17 2001 - 17:08:55 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5864] RE: Re: Re: Reply to fred - A & B Michael Williams (Sun Jun 17 2001 - 18:06:51 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5865] Re: Re: Reply to fred - A & B Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 18 2001 - 01:25:19 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5866] Re: Re: Re: Reply to fred - A & B Christopher Arthur (Mon Jun 18 2001 - 18:09:39 EDT)
    • [OPE-L:5867] Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to fred - A & B Fred B. Moseley (Mon Jun 25 2001 - 01:05:53 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5868] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Reply to fred - A & B howard engelskirchen (Tue Jun 26 2001 - 03:34:35 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5869] RE: : Reply to fred - A & B -> The Value-Form Michael Williams (Tue Jun 26 2001 - 07:11:27 EDT)
  • [OPE-L:5870] Re: Reply to fred Fred B. Moseley (Thu Jun 28 2001 - 00:08:00 EDT)
• [OPE-L:5871] Re: RE: : Reply to fred - A & B -> The Value-Form howard engelskirchen (Fri Jun 29 2001 - 05:02:58 EDT)

Last message date: Fri Jun 29 2001 - 04:59:54 EDT
Archived on: Sun Jul 15 2001 - 10:56:30 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Jul 15 2001 - 10:56:30 EDT