[OPE-L:5964] Fwd: Fw: The Tamim Ansary Letter

From: Patrick L. Mason (pmason@garnet.acns.fsu.edu)
Date: Thu Sep 20 2001 - 00:07:51 EDT


>X-Comment: CMUVM.CSV.CMICH.EDU: Mail was sent by bay.csuhayward.edu
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
>Date:         Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:53:28 -0700
>Reply-To: Association of Black Sociologists <ABSLST-L@LISTSERV.CMICH.EDU>
>Sender: Association of Black Sociologists <ABSLST-L@LISTSERV.CMICH.EDU>
>From: "Benjamin P. Bowser" <bbowser@CSUHAYWARD.EDU>
>Subject:      Fw: The Tamim Ansary Letter
>To: ABSLST-L@LISTSERV.CMICH.EDU
>
>See commentary below from an Afghan.  Interesting inside view of the current
>war cry to bomb them back to the stone age.
>
>Benjamin Bowser
>
>Department of Sociology and Social Services
>California State University, Hayward
>Hayward, Ca. 94542
>510-885-3187
>510-885-2390 Fax
>http://www.isis.csuhayward.edu/alss/soc/bbowser
>
>
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Uzoma Onyeije
> > > > To: Onyeije@earthlink.net
> > > > Sent: 9/18/01 6:44 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is a rational, thought provoking, and chilling commentary.  It
> > > > comes from Tamim, a writer and columnist in San Francisco, who comes
> > > > from Afghanistan.
> > > > >
> > > > > * * * *
> > > > >
> > > > I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back to the
> > > > Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO Talk Radio today, allowed that this
> > > would
> > > > mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this
> > > > atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage. What
> > > > else can we do?"  Minutes later I heard some TV pundit discussing
> > > > whether we "have the belly to do what must be done."
> > > >
> > > >  And I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I
> > > > am from Afghanistan, and even though I've lived here for 35 years I've
> > > > never lost track of what's going on there. So I want to tell anyone
> > > who
> > > > will
> > > > > listen how it all looks from where I'm standing.
> > > >
> > > > I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden. There is no
> > > > doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity
> > > > in>New York. I agree that something must be done about those monsters.
> > > >
> > > > But the Taliban and Ben Laden are not Afghanistan.  They're not even
> > > the
> > > > government of Afghanistan.  The Taliban are a cult of ignorant
> > > > psychotics who took over Afghanistan in 1997. Bin Laden is a political
> > > > criminal with a plan.  When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When you
> > > > think Bin Laden,think Hitler. And when you think  "the people of
> > > > Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the concentration camps."
> > > >
> > > > It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing to do with this
> > > > atrocity. They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They would
> > > > exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban and clear
> > > out
> > > > the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their country.
> > > >
> > > > Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
> > > > answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering.
> > > > A few years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000
> > > > disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country with no economy, no food.
> > > > There are millions of widows.  And the Taliban  has been burying these
> > > > widows alive in mass graves. The soil is littered with land mines, the
> > > > farms were all
> > > > destroyed by the Soviets.  These are a few of the reasons why the
> > > Afghan
> > > > people have not overthrown the Taliban.
> > > >
> > > > We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone
> > > > Age.Trouble is, that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already.
> > > > Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering. Level their
> > > houses?
> > > > Done. Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.  Eradicate their
> > > > hospitals? Done.  Destroy their infrastructure? Cut them off from
> > > > medicine and health care? Too late. Someone already did all that.
> > > >
> > > > New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs.  Would they at
> > > > least get the Taliban? Not likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the
> > > > Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around.  They'd slip
> > > away
> > > > and hide. Maybe the bombs would get some of those disabled orphans,
> > > they
> > > > don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs. But flying over
> > > > Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against the
> > > > criminals who did this horrific thing. Actually it would only be
> > > making
> > > > common cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the people they've
> > > > been raping all this time.
> > > >
> > > > So what else is there? What can be done, then? Let me now speak with
> > > > true fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden is to go in
> > > there
> > > > with ground troops. When people speak of "having the belly to do what
> > > > needs to be done" they're thinking in terms of having the belly to
> > > kill
> > > > as many as needed.  Having the belly to overcome any moral qualms
> > > about
> > > > killing innocent people. Let's pull our heads out of the sand. What's
> > > > actually on the table is Americans dying. And not just because some
> > > > Americans would die fighting their way through Afghanistan to Bin
> > > > Laden's hideout.  It's much bigger than that folks. Because to get any
> > > > troops to Afghanistan, we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they
> > > let
> > > > us?  Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be first. Will
> > > > other Muslim nations just stand by? You see where I'm going. We're
> > > > flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.
> > > >
> > > > And guess what: that's Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what he
> > > > wants. That's why he did this. Read his speeches and statements. It's
> > > > all right there.  He  really believes Islam would beat the west. It
> > > > might seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world
> > > into
> > > > Islam and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the west wreaks a
> > > > holocaust in those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to
> > > > lose, that's even better from Bin Laden's point of view. He's probably
> > > > wrong, in the end the West would win, whatever that  would mean, but
> > > the
> > > > war would last for years and millions would die, not just theirs but
> > > > ours. Who has  the belly for that?
> > > >
> > > > Bin Laden does. Anyone else?
> > > >
> > > > Tamim Ansary
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged,
> > > > confidential, and may be protected from disclosure; please be aware
> > > that
> > > any
> > > > other use, printing, copying, disclosure or dissemination of this
> > > > communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. If you
> > > think
> > > > that you have received this E-mail message in error, please reply to
> > > the
> > > > sender.
> > > >
> > > > This E-mail message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses
> > > and
> > > > are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect
> > > any
> > > > computer system into which it is received and opened. However, it is
> > > the
> > > > responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no
> > > > responsibility is accepted by Kelley Drye & Warren LLP for any loss or
> > > > damage arising in any way from its use.
> > > >
> > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 02 2001 - 00:00:05 EDT