[OPE-L:6295] Re: Grossman and Luxemburg

From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Sat Jan 12 2002 - 13:33:47 EST

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:6296] Re: Re: Re: Re: recent science and society and Fred M's interpretation"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:6294] Re: Re: Re: Re: grossman (response to paul z)"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:6288] Re: Grossman and Luxemburg"
Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:6292] Re: Re: grossman (response to paul z)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Rakesh asked in [6288]:

> Let us say that 
> grossman was a coward--does this in  itself invalidate his critique 
> of luxemburg's theory of accumulation and crisis?

Of course not./  In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:6296] Re: Re: Re: Re: recent science and society and Fred M's interpretation"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:6294] Re: Re: Re: Re: grossman (response to paul z)"
In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:6288] Re: Grossman and Luxemburg"
Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:6292] Re: Re: grossman (response to paul z)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 02 2002 - 00:00:05 EST