[OPE-L:6393] (Fwd) Re: Re: On the meaning and implications of

From: Andrew Brown (Andrew@lubs.leeds.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Jan 21 2002 - 09:43:48 EST


------- Forwarded message follows -------

From:           	Paul Zarembka <zarembka@acsu.buffalo.edu>
Date sent:      	Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:44:05 -0500
To:             	"Andrew Brown" <Andrew@lubs.leeds.ac.uk>
Subject:        	Re: [OPE-L:6391] Re: On the meaning and implications of price-value equivalence

"Value, Price and Profit" does the same.

Paul

************************************************************************
Paul Zarembka, editor, RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY at
********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka


"Andrew Brown" <Andrew@lubs.leeds.ac.uk> said, on 01/21/02:

>In chapter 5 Marx *shows* that you *cannot* explain surplus value  through
>the positing of unequal exchange. Marx shows this by  going through buyers
>'cheating' sellers; sellars cheating buyers;  and derivative scenarios.
>Each time he shows that surplus value is  not explained. This is all he
>means by the citation you provide us  with above.

------- End of forwarded message -------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 02 2002 - 00:00:06 EST