Rakesh [6372] writes in part: >You are hung up on a point the significance of which you have not been able to >establish. Really? I would have thought our disagreement was over the details of my argument, not its significance. Let me check this by asking you a question, Rakesh: Is the commodification of labor power *essential* or *incidental* to the process of transforming money into capital, according to Marx's account in Volume I of Capital? Gil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Feb 02 2002 - 00:00:06 EST