>OK, who goes next? > >In solidarity, Jerry > > > >> * WHO ADVANCED OUR UNDERSTANDING OF >> CAPITALISM SINCE MARX? >> * and what were their contributions to that understanding that >> weren't already IN Marx's writings? >> * Also: what contributions to our understanding of that >> subject matter concerned something *other than* attempting >> to develop our understanding of how capitalism has >> changed and developed since Marx's time? Sohn-Rethel, Alfred 1978 Intellectual and Manual Labour for value form Uno gets a plus - for postponing the introduction of labour in the exposition, and a minus for making abstract labour ahistorical and asocial >> * Also: is there *any* major part of Marx's theory that the >> development of subsequent thought shows needs to be >> modified or rejected? marx completely failed to grasp the ecological problematic. All the relevant stuff attributes the problem to capital - he does not see the use value side is itself an issue. So all the stuff in the Marx/green debate is relevant. The implications for 'a society of abundance' and what presupposes that is obvious. Chris A 17 Bristol Road, Brighton, BN2 1AP, England
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 00:00:04 EST