Hi Chris. Thanks for your [6335]. A (really) brief question: >> * Also: is there *any* major part of Marx's theory that the >> development of subsequent thought shows needs to be >> modified or rejected? > marx completely failed to grasp the ecological problematic. All > the relevant stuff attributes the problem to capital - he does > not see the use value side is itself an issue. So all the stuff > in the Marx/green debate is relevant. The implications for 'a > society of abundance' and what presupposes that is obvious. Have you read [fellow OPE-Ler] Paul Brukett's _Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective_ [NY, St. Martin's Press, 1999; ISBN 0-312-21940-7]? In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 00:00:04 EST