Partly my fault: my message to Jerry inadvertently went to the whole list. That blasted "reply" key makes it possible to fire off a message faster than you can blink, which I guess is how the document under discussion got to Jerry in the first place (and how Alan's message to me got to the whole list). Sorry 'bout that. For what it's worth, I don't think Jerry violated any rule of professional etiquette. I second Alfredo's supportive words. Gary -----Original Message----- From: Michael Williams [SMTP:michaelj.williams@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 11:37 AM To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu Subject: [OPE-L:6680] RE: RE: RE: *Internal Discussion Document Available* This looks like a personal note from Alan to Gary. Why is it being imposed on me? michael -----Original Message----- From: owner-ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu [mailto:owner-ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu]On Behalf Of Alan Freeman Sent: 08 March 2002 16:32 To: mongiovg@stjohns.edu; ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu Subject: [OPE-L:6679] RE: RE: *Internal Discussion Document Available* Gary I am happy to send you the letter myself. I would request that you do not indulge Jerry's violation of all normal professional etiquette by leaving the decision on whether to retail it to him. Alan --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.320 / Virus Database: 179 - Release Date: 30/01/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.320 / Virus Database: 179 - Release Date: 30/01/2002
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 00:00:05 EST