From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Wed Nov 27 2002 - 09:24:16 EST
Michael E, replying to Nicky, in [8064] wrote:
> Revolution is a turning in which what is at the bottom comes
> to the top, and what is at the top comes to the bottom.
Sounds good, but:
What of bourgeois revolutions like the revolutions of 1848?
a) Capitalists were not on the bottom prior to those revolutions;
b) the working class and peasantry hardly went to the top after
bourgeois revolutions, and;
c) the landowning class didn't go to the bottom.
In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 28 2002 - 00:00:01 EST