From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Fri Dec 06 2002 - 17:02:28 EST
Paolo wrote in [8135]: > I may be wrong but what I am arguing is that a "condition for" cannot be > identified as a "reason for"...It is something similar to the joke Marx > makes at a certain point in Capital: the condition for digestion is a > good stomach. Actual digestion, on the other hand, needs something > more..." That is, the condition for the existence of surplus > value cannot be identified with an explanation for why it exists. *Source*: Responding to a quote from Rossi, Marx wrote: "When we speak of capacity for labour, we do not speak of labour, any more than we speak of digestion when we speak of capacity for digestion. As is well known, the latter process requires something more than a good stomach." (Volume 1, Ch. 6, in paragraph which begins "It is an extraordinarily cheap kind of sentimentality", Penguin ed., p. 277). Tony T take note: to find the above, I went to the M/E archive at www.marxists.org and did a word search of the 3 volumes _Capital_ for "digestion" and "stomach" (there was only the 1 match) and then found the corresponding page number in the Penguin edition. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Dec 08 2002 - 00:00:01 EST