[OPE-L:8319] RE: Re: Re: Electronics and Value

From: Chai-on Lee (conlee@chonnam.ac.kr)
Date: Sun Jan 12 2003 - 17:36:28 EST

Next message: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8320] Re: Electronics and Value"
Previous message: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8318] Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
In reply to: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8318] Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
Next in thread: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8323] Re: RE: Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
Reply: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8323] Re: RE: Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Clyder said:

> Do they really employ nobody? No repair staff, no computer operators
> and programmers?


But the repair staff, computer operators and programmers do not belong to the category of direct labor.
They all belong to that of indirect labor. 
A criterion between direct and indirect labor is that one increases in proportion to the volume of output products while the other dores not.


Chai-on

Next message: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8320] Re: Electronics and Value"
Previous message: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8318] Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
In reply to: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8318] Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
Next in thread: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8323] Re: RE: Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
Reply: clyder@gn.apc.org: "[OPE-L:8323] Re: RE: Re: Re: Electronics and Value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 14 2003 - 00:00:01 EST