From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 08:54:58 EST
(In the belief that the list can chew bubble gum and walk at the same time, we can simultaneously discuss abstract theory -- such as the following -- and more immediate events.) A further question on Phil's [8570]: > Exchange-value is accidental because it falls under the category of > relation. Intrinsic value is accidental because it falls under the > category of quantity. What is the basis for asserting that categories of relation and quantity (and doesn't quantity itself express a relation?) are accidental? Is this somehow related to a Aristotelian conception of 'accidental'? In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 20 2003 - 00:00:01 EST