From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Mon May 12 2003 - 09:16:06 EDT
Andy, you wrote: "On the one hand we have Hegel-inspired systematic dialecticians trying to construe a large part of Marx's essential position as metaphorical, and another large part as failing to break from clasical political economy sufficiently. On the other, we have critical realists who must try to interpret Marx's labour theory of value as a more or less plausible 'hypotheses', for 'testing', thereby strip away the claims to *necessity* that permeate Marx's own account of the move from exchange value to labor and value." RE "failing to break from classical political economy sufficiently" by the Hegelian-inspired, do you mean that they fail to appreciate the importance of the constitution of abstract labor under the capitalist mode of production? Also, if you have an article on your position, please let us know. Thanks. Paul *********************************************************************** "Confronting 9-11, Ideologies of Race, and Eminent Economists", Vol. 20 RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Paul Zarembka, editor, Elsevier Science ******************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 13 2003 - 00:00:00 EDT