From: Ian Wright (ian_paul_wright@HOTMAIL.COM)
Date: Mon May 19 2003 - 03:15:06 EDT
I cannot answer your question but I would also be interested in this paper, since I think Brinkman's work is an interesting critique of the "physical quantity" argument, which claims to demonstrate that the value system is logically irrelevant to the determination of capitalist reality. To summarise, he argues that the "physical quantity" system, although a consistent model, is incomplete. Incomplete because it ignores the relative distribution of social labour-time that fixes the relative size of the productive sectors. Once the physical quantity argument is extended to include the distribution of social labour-time, the value system is not logically irrelevant, but in fact has interesting relationships with the price system. I have a copy of his "On the relation between labour-time and money in a two sector system of commodity production and exchange" which (I think) was presented at an IWGVT conference. -Ian. >From: Dong-Min Rieu 盟翕團 <rieudm@CUVIC.CNU.AC.KR> >Reply-To: OPE-L <OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU> >To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU >Subject: [OPE-L] Brinkman's paper >Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 13:54:45 +0900 > >I am interested in the following paper the summary of which is introduced >in Duncan's paper. >Does anybody know where it is (whether published or not)? >Thanks in advance! > >Robert F. Brinkman, "Derivation of the New Interpretation of the Labor >Theory of Value" > >Dong-Min Rieu > >http://business.cnu.ac.kr/~dmryu >rieudm@cnu.ac.kr > _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 20 2003 - 00:00:01 EDT