Re: (OPE-L) the _struggle_ over the length of the working day

From: Rakesh Bhandari (rakeshb@STANFORD.EDU)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 13:00:06 EDT

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Previous message: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) Re: Negri on socialization"
In reply to: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Next in thread: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) Re: the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Reply: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) Re: the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
>To comprehend class struggle as a real *struggle*, i.e. in
>actuality, one must recognize that the demands of the working-
>class do not arise _only_ in a 'defensive' manner:


Jerry,
In his reply to Weston, didn't Marx say that nine out of ten worker
struggles are in fact defensive in nature? Perhaps my memory fails
me. If not, what led Marx  to that conclusion? Or what did he mean by
it? And why exactly was he wrong?
Yours, Rakesh

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Previous message: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) Re: Negri on socialization"
In reply to: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Next in thread: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) Re: the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Reply: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) Re: the _struggle_ over the length of the working day"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 00:00:01 EDT