Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value

From: Rakesh Bhandari (rakeshb@STANFORD.EDU)
Date: Mon Nov 10 2003 - 06:56:23 EST

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Dynamic value and natural price"
In reply to: ajit sinha: "Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Did Marx's assumption in VPP that money wage struggles could be
successful in raising the real wage depend in any way on his
assumption of a commodity theory of money? I think Prabhat Patnaik
suggests that his Weston critique did depend on this assumption. But
I am not clear why he says so. Do others agree?
Rakesh

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Dynamic value and natural price"
In reply to: ajit sinha: "Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 11 2003 - 00:00:00 EST