Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour

From: Phil Dunn (pscumnud@DIRCON.CO.UK)
Date: Thu Nov 27 2003 - 15:00:19 EST

Next message: Phil Dunn: "Re: (OPE-L) value, money, and the exchange of equivalents"
Previous message: michael a. lebowitz: "Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour"
Next in thread: paul cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour"
Reply: paul cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
>
>In view of this, why should I read Volume III?
>
>Phil
>

Paul:

>--------------------------------------------------
>Because a large part of volume III is devoted to looking at
>the circumstances in which the price value identity assumption
>is relaxed.

Phil:

My reply to Jerry covers this issue.

Next message: Phil Dunn: "Re: (OPE-L) value, money, and the exchange of equivalents"
Previous message: michael a. lebowitz: "Re: indirect labor, the real wage, and the production of surplus value"
In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour"
Next in thread: paul cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour"
Reply: paul cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Unproductive Labour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 29 2003 - 00:00:01 EST