Re: (OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money

From: Paul Cockshott (clyder@GN.APC.ORG)
Date: Sun May 30 2004 - 15:51:54 EDT

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: on money"
Previous message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: on money"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money"
Reply: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sunday 30 May 2004 01:02, glevy@PRATT.EDU wrote:
> Hi Paul C.
>
> > The mystery is solved when one realises that money is not a
> > substance but a technology of record.
>
> When there is a money commodity then money has both a
> substance and is a symbol.
>
> In solidarity, Jerry
Can you cite a historical instance of a money commodity
in a capitalist society?

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: on money"
Previous message: Howard Engelskirchen: "Re: on money"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money"
Reply: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "(OPE-L) Re: On the mango theory of money"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 31 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT