From: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM
Date: Wed Nov 10 2004 - 08:48:26 EST
Rakesh wrote: > No precise year could ever be deduced from Bauer's model anyway. Each > period could represent a month or a decade. The initial conditions > are arbitrarily postulated and a change in them would obviously > change the year of economic breakdown. Why not a century? Why not a millennium? Doesn't there have to be some correspondence between theoretical time and real time? Without such a correspondence, then the "breakdown" that Grossmann postulates could be deemed to be potentially so distant in the future that workers and capitalists need not be concerned about it. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 11 2004 - 00:00:01 EST