Re: (OPE-L) recent references on 'problem' of money commodity?

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Sun Nov 21 2004 - 20:33:21 EST

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) recent references on 'problem' of money commodity?"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) Luxemburg's Intro to P.E. in English"
In reply to: Allin Cottrell: "Re: (OPE-L) recent references on 'problem' of money commodity?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 9:25 PM -0500 11/19/04, Allin Cottrell wrote:
>
>Gold is peculiar, in that it is relatively imperishable and the
>existing stock very much dominates flow production,

  Peculiar enough that gold does not belong in a set of simultaneous
equations for branches of production where the profit rate is set as
equalized?

>  so therefore on
>Ricardian/Marxian grounds the price is relatively indeterminate,
>governed by speculative considerations.

  So you would agree that Bortkiewicz mishandled gold money in his
transformation equations?

Rakesh

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) recent references on 'problem' of money commodity?"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: (OPE-L) Luxemburg's Intro to P.E. in English"
In reply to: Allin Cottrell: "Re: (OPE-L) recent references on 'problem' of money commodity?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Nov 22 2004 - 00:00:02 EST