Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?

From: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 14:31:27 EST

Next message: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Previous message: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
In reply to: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Next in thread: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Reply: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> But since your model is in difference-eq form (dynamic), [...]

Anders:

If  it is a short-run model in which "productivity, population, and physical
capital stocks in place are all constant"  how can it be said to have a
"dynamic" form?    Difference equations by themselves do not a dynamic
model make.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Previous message: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
In reply to: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Next in thread: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Reply: Anders Ekeland: "Re: [OPE-L] Teaching Tautologies : dynamic or static?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 16 2005 - 00:00:01 EST