From: Howard Engelskirchen (howarde@TWCNY.RR.COM)
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 20:27:53 EDT
I didn't get a chance to mention this a month or so ago when Adorno last came up on the list, but for any interested I have an article from last year called "Powers and Particulars: Adorno and Scientific Realism," which appeared in the Journal of Critical Realism, v. 3, no. 1 at 1 (2004). I make the point that while Adorno was active during the early years of the emergence of scientific realism, natural science was for him 'a sensitive weak point.' He never challenged Hume's concept of causality and as a consequence could not challenge positivism's core ontological assumptions. While there are suggestions that he thought of aesthetics a bit differently, in general he clung to the Enlightenment idea that any ontology of powers was mixed up with occult aspects of traditional metaphysics. This put limits on his thought and undermined the force of his critique of positivism, a lesson is relevant to our own understanding of realism's challenge to varieties of critical theory today. Howard ----- Original Message ----- From: glevy@PRATT.EDU To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 6:38 PM Subject: [OPE-L] Philosopher of the Month <http://www.philosophersnet.com/cafe/cafearticle.php?name=philosopher> Philosopher of the Month: Theodor Adorno Jack Furlong A critic of modern jazz, a key theoretician of the left and a leader in the most celebrated academic institute of the last century, Theodor Weisengrund Adorno combined the intense speculative focus of a German academic with the feel for the concrete of a French aesthete. Along the way, he also unwittingly became a model - and a foil - for Anglo-American culture critics. As a teenager, Adorno spent many Saturday afternoons poring over Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason with Siegfried Kracauer, who encouraged him to read philosophy in its socio-historical context and to apply philosophical and sociological tools to understand such cultural artefacts as film. Not surprisingly, as an undergraduate, he applied himself to philosophy, psychology and sociology and, after spending three years studying music in Vienna with avant-garde composers, he completed his doctoral degree requirements and began writing. His work over the span of forty years never lost the connectivity of art, philosophy and cultural criticism that so enthralled him in his early reading of Kant with Kracauer. Adorno wrote most of his mature work under the aegis of the celebrated Institute for Social Research. He officially joined in 1938, but his relationship with its guiding spirit and founder, Max Horkheimer, began in the 1920s when they took courses together. Along with several others, they began a collaborative research programme within the Institute called the Frankfurt School of Critical Theory. Under Horkheimer and Adorno, the school dedicated itself to producing research characterized by the systematic rejection of closed philosophical and political systems, and a commitment to ongoing study and criticism of current oppressive sociopolitical structures. Less interested in Marx's reductionist critique of capitalism than traditional Marxists, the Frankfurt School sought to expand his criticisms of bourgeois culture. Less preoccupied with praxis (revolutionary action) than with theoretical insight into oppressive structures and processes, the school was often charged by more orthodox Marxists with elitism and passivity. This accent on culture and the charge of elitism have marked Adorno's career. Adorno would put himself in the same group as Hegel, Marx and others who used the form of argumentation known as dialectics to unmask the hypocrisies and absurdities of the political and social status quo. Contemporary bourgeois life requires that all of its aspects be controlled - the statehouse, the family, the church, the airwaves, the marketplace. This 'administered world' needs homogenized certainties, concepts taken for granted unfailingly, in order to maintain total control. Hence, says Adorno, modern regimes 'reify' - make into a thing - and quantify what cannot be fashioned into permanent concepts and identifies, but which nonetheless prove useful to those who rule. For Adorno, the most tragic manifestation of this 'administered world' was the Holocaust, in which even human beings themselves were 'reified' - counted, recorded and, eventually, 'consumed'. Dominating regimes must run according to political theories made of clear, determined concepts and predictable logic - a closed system. Philosophy for Adorno contests this desire for conceptual and systematic finality, for philosophical concepts resist their own closure. So understood, philosophy is dialectics, or 'thought driven by its own insufficiency.' Philosophy must constantly criticize itself, preventing the negative energy of thinking from getting short-circuited by conformity. Art, too, like philosophy, can liberate people from the claustrophobia of power. 'Works of art,' states Adorno 'are social products which have discarded the illusion of being-for-society, an illusion tendentiously maintained by all other commodities.' To the extent that art gives people what they expected, it becomes a commodity. This theme appears vividly in Adorno's best known book, Dialectic of Enlightenment (1947), co-authored by Horkheimer. The authors first describe how the Enlightenment concept of reason became an efficient tool for social and political administrations to ensure the compliance of the administered at all levels of discourse and practice. 'Through the countless agencies of mass production and its culture the conventionalised modes of behaviour are impressed on the individual as the only natural, respectable, and rational ones. He defines himself only as a thing.' Even art becomes commodified, an example of 'instrumental reason', producing what the authors call 'the culture industry'. Though written in the 1940s this critique has not lost its relevance: speaking about what they saw as a growing monopoly, Adorno and Horkheimer claimed that 'Movies and radio need no longer pretend to be art. The truth that they are just business is made into an ideology in order to justify the rubbish they deliberately produce.' Widely anthologized, this chapter on the culture industry has inspired and guided the relatively new field of culture studies in the social sciences and humanities. In the last year of his life, Adorno became embattled with radical students, and charges of elitism unfortunately made his last few months stressful. Yet Adorno's reputation survived to the extent that, currently, his is often claimed as a precursor to postmodern and post-structuralist thought. Suggested reading Adorno, T. 1991. The Culture Industry: Selected essays on mass culture. London: Routledge. O'Connor, B. 2000 (ed.). The Adorno Reader. Oxford: Blackwell. Horkheimer, M & Adorno, T. W. 1976 [1947], Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Continuum.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 29 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT