http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/article.php4?article_id=6657
11 June 2005
Features
Jean-Paul Sartre - philosophy of freedom
Rebecca Pitt celebrates the life, politics and ideas of
Jean-Paul Sartre
What do you imagine when you think of a philosopher? Someone who
spends his or her time pondering the meaning of existence, but never
reaching any conclusion? Or someone far removed from the real
world?
Or are you reminded of Karl Marx's famous words, "Philosophers
have only interpreted the world in various ways - the point is to
change it"?
The French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, who was born 100 years ago
this month, tried not only to write about and understand the events of
his life, but also use his fame to further a range of left wing
causes.
Sartre was born in Paris and, following his father's death, spent
his early childhood in the French provinces.
He spent a lot of time in his grandfather's library and was
encouraged to write by his mother.
The young Sartre saw reading and writing as the main way of receiving
and expressing knowledge about the world.
From this fervent belief Sartre would develop what he later described
as a "neurosis of literature", which he explored in his
autobiography, Words.
Although Sartre would later claim he was cured of his "neurosis",
he continued to have an immense capacity for reading and writing until
he went totally blind in the 1970s.
Sartre studied philosophy at the Ecole Normale Supérieure in Paris.
His interest in this subject had been sparked by the idea that, like
literature, it offered "truths", or knowledge of the world.
While studying at university Sartre met fellow philosopher and writer
Simone de Beauvoir, who became his lifelong companion.
After the Second World War they launched a left wing, intellectual
magazine, Les Temps Modernes (Modern Times), whose aim, according to
de Beauvoir, was to offer "an ideology for the post-war age".
The journal also involved the philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty and
the writer Albert Camus.
Sartre also expressed ideas through his novels and plays. He produced
several major philosophical works and wrote biographies of the writers
Genet, Flaubert and Baudelaire.
By the time he died in 1980, he had established himself as a major
figure in French life, through his ideas, his writing and his
association with a number of left wing causes.
Thousands thronged the streets of Paris at his funeral to pay their
last respects. Montparnasse cemetery became so packed that someone
even fell into his open grave.
Responsibility
What was Sartre saying that captured the imagination of so many
people, and why should Sartre's ideas be of interest to us 25 years
after his death?
In the 1972 film, Sartre by Himself, Sartre reveals that in his youth
he developed a lifelong interest in "freedom and responsibility".
This idea of freedom motivated Sartre's political decisions and
guided his written work.
At the age of 16, Sartre already viewed colonialism "as an
anti-human brutality" because it tried to suppress others'
freedom.
He strongly opposed fascism and racism for the same reason.
Today, Sartre is best known as a "philosopher of freedom" and for
this reason his ideas have continuing appeal.
His major work, Being and Nothingness, written in 1943, set out this
philosophy, known as existentialism.
Existentialism argues that there is no reason or meaning for existence
- we are born without specific purpose and we do not exist because
of god or some abstract cause.
We are not fated to behave in certain ways, or to accomplish certain
things. Instead, we are born free of meaning. This idea is summed up
by Sartre in the phrase - "Existence precedes essence."
For Sartre, because we are free in every situation, we are also
responsible for our own "essence", or the choices that we make.
However, the weight of our own freedom, or the "nothingness of
being", can also lead to "bad faith".
"Bad faith" is a form of self-denial in which one tries to avoid
the awesome responsibility of one's own total freedom.
In Being and Nothingness, Sartre gives examples taken from everyday
life, showing how we interact with the world and other people.
These examples reveal the ease with which we slip into complacency and
"bad faith", and how we cannot escape our own freedom.
Sartre claimed that certain circumstances revealed one's total
freedom as more obvious and demanding than it might have previously
seemed.
In 1944 he declared, "Never were we more free than under the
Germans The cruelty of the enemy drove us to the extreme limits of
this situation by forcing us to ask those questions which in times of
peace can be avoided."
Nazi repression of France posed a difficult question for its
inhabitants - would they accept the occupation or resist it? Sartre
delivered a message of resistance to his fellow citizens, in the guise
of Greek tragedy, with his 1943 play The Flies.
He also organised a loose resistance collective called Socialisme et
Liberté (Socialism and Freedom).
Existentialism's emphasis on freedom was to prove a popular theory
in post-war France and it propelled Sartre to fame. It was also a
philosophy that he made accessible through novels such as Nausea.
Existentialism gained its own popularised media image - the
stereotype of the black-clad, chain-smoking intellectual writing in a
Parisian café.
It also became connected with jazz and dancing.
Indeed, Sartre did all of these things - though not necessarily all
at once. The current French National Library exhibition of Sartre's
manuscripts and correspondence decided to remove a cigarette from
their poster of Sartre following concerns that it would put off
commercial sponsors.
Later, Sartre developed existentialism alongside a growing interest in
Marxism.
In 1960 his Critique of Dialectical Reason, an amphetamine-fuelled
attempt to synthesise existentialism and Marxism, Sartre argued that
Marxism was "the one philosophy of our time which we cannot go
beyond".
Marxism would become irrelevant only after a revolution that resulted
in the genuine freedom of all human beings. It would then be replaced
by a "philosophy of freedom".
Sartre himself cites two reasons for his shift towards Marxism.
First, his serious study of dialectics - the philosophy that
underpins Marx's ideas. Second, the changing political climate
post-1945 and the influence repressive Cold War politics had on the
left.
Limits
Sartre never committed himself to one political party, looking instead
for the best way to represent his desire for "socialism and
freedom".
In practice this meant aligning himself with different groups during
different periods. In the 1940s Sartre had been involved with the
anti-capitalist, anti-Stalinist RDR.
In the 1970s he would align himself with the Maoists.
In the early 1950s he was, by his own admission, a "fellow
traveller" of the French Communist Party (PCF), supporting some of
their campaigns and writing favourably on the USSR following a visit
in 1954.
Sartre's relationship with the PCF would end when the USSR invaded
Hungary in 1956.
In the introduction to his Critique of Dialectical Reason, Sartre made
his views on the PCF clear - Stalinism's determinism, which
downplayed the importance of the individual in consciously shaping
history, was indefensible.
The same philosophical work also showed Sartre moving on from the
formulations of Being and Nothingness.
He now argued that freedom had to be placed in a historical context,
which places limits on individual freedom.
As he later acknowledged, "Historical conditioning exists every
minute of our lives."
Sartre did not simply express his radical views through his
philosophical writings. He spoke out on the key political events of
his time. From the 1940s onwards was a vocal opponent of French
colonialism.
Both he and de Beauvoir signed the "Manifesto of the 121"
demanding liberation for the French colony of Algeria. His
anti-colonialism nearly cost him his life when nationalist groups
attempted to blow up his apartment.
His writings on colonialism, including an introduction to Frantz
Fanon's The Wretched of the Earth, marked Sartre out as an exception
in the philosophical world - a philosopher prepared to engage with
issues of Third World oppression.
Because of the "war on terror", current interest in Sartre's
work focuses on his support for the right of the oppressed to use
violence to liberate themselves.
He also supported striking workers, anti-Vietnam protesters and
students in revolt. He was led to question his own role as an
intellectual during the French revolt of 1968.
He would speak at rallies, attend demonstrations and sell
revolutionary papers. He refused the Nobel Prize for Literature in
1964 because "a writer must refuse to allow himself to be
transformed into an institution".
Sartre was many things - an intellectual, philosopher, biographer,
writer, activist and even a pianist, singer and boxer.
He wrote on all facets of human experience and dedicated his work to
the fight for genuine liberation.
He urged his philosophy students in the 1930s "to approach the world
with a critical mind, to question constantly every acquired
notion".
His philosophy of freedom stresses that the world we live in can
be changed and that we are free and responsible for fighting for that
change. It is for these reasons that Sartre's work needs to be
read.