Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics

From: Ian Wright (iwright@GMAIL.COM)
Date: Thu Sep 22 2005 - 22:57:56 EDT 

On 9/22/05, Ian Wright <iwright@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Would, say, race horses count as an example of self-reproducing
> > non-basics? And is the problem that (say) it might be the case that
> > the reproduction rate of race horses implies a rate of profit in
> > excess of what can be achieved in the basic sector, so that one
> > can't have a uniform rate of profit without shenanigans?
>
>

For precision, I should have said "yes", except the race-horse "sector"
produces at a rate *lower* than what can be achieved in the basic sector.

-Ian.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 24 2005 - 00:00:03 EDT