Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry

From: Diego Guerrero (diego.guerrero@CPS.UCM.ES)
Date: Fri Oct 07 2005 - 04:46:06 EDT

Next message: Diego Guerrero: "[OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services"
Previous message: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry"
Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Surely I didn't express myself adequately. I meant that, in a pure model of
productive, labour circulation, etc. are unproductive and general costs, ie
"faux frais". But if we take the state into account, we should add new faux
frais: all money that capitalists have to transfer to the state.

----- Original Message -----
From: <glevy@PRATT.EDU>
To: <OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry

> re Diego's message ofg 10/3:
> <http://ricardo.ecn.wfu.edu/~cottrell/ope/archive/0510/0029.html >
>
>> All taxes are faux frais in a pure model with no State.
>
> In a pure model with no state, why would there by taxes?
>
> In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Diego Guerrero: "[OPE-L] cockshott, Fw: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services"
Previous message: Diego Guerrero: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services"
In reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] faux frais and the armaments industry"
Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] basics vs. non-basics and financial services"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 08 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT