Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Wed Oct 19 2005 - 21:21:02 EDT

Next message: Jerry Levy: "[OPE-L] Nov 3: The WTO Meeting In Hong Kong: What's at Stake for the Poor?"
Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
In reply to: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 12:22 AM +0100 10/20/05, Andrew Brown wrote:
>Hi Rakesh,
>
>You wrote 'But dispositional ev is then only potential ev'.
>
>Correct. My point is that potential exchange value is (an) actual
>(form of) value.

And of course I think potential exchange value is a potential form of value.

>  Value and exchange value are not the same.

Agreed.

>
>Does this make any sense?

Of course it does, I'm just not persuaded. And neither you by me.
What to do? I am willing to move on.

yours, r

>
>Andy

Next message: Jerry Levy: "[OPE-L] Nov 3: The WTO Meeting In Hong Kong: What's at Stake for the Poor?"
Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
In reply to: Andrew Brown: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Next in thread: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Capital in General"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 20 2005 - 00:00:03 EDT